User road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0

"Our findings show that writing scholarly healthcare improvement work requires a specific knowledge base, and this knowledge is not universally held. We now know some of the specific gaps that should be addressed to help SQUIRE 2.0 reach its goal of improving the reporting of improvement work. The findings should be helpful not just for the development of SQUIRE 2.0 but also in the education of the next generation, for whom exposure to improvement work is now becoming standard."

Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0
L Davies, KZ Donnelly, DJ Goodman, G Ogrinc
BMJ Quality and Safety 2016;25:265-272 doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117

Read more here.

Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events

"Improving reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews is an important step towards a balanced assessment of an intervention."

Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review
L Zorzela, S Golder, Y Liu, K Pilkington, L Hartling, A Joffe, Y Loke, S Vohra
British Medical Journal, 2014, 348 (8th January)

Read more here.